Would Russian president Vladimir Putin actually use intercontinental or tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine?
However, regardless of speculative discussions of Putin’s possible temperament or sanity, it is clear that Putin and Lavrov are using the prospect of global nuclear war to prevent the United States and NATO from taking a more active role in Ukraine. Will cooler heads and deescalation prevail? Thus far, that is unclear, but the United States and its allies are continuing to arm Ukraine while seeking to manage what is becoming the most dangerous geopolitical confrontation in decades. The U.S. nuclear triad which maintains U.S. deterrence is extremely functional and quite capable of inflicting massive destruction upon Russia on short notice. But, you know, again, I think it’s unhelpful and dangerous to … rattle sabers and speculate about the use of nuclear weapons,” Austin said. … any bluster about the possible use of nuclear weapons is very dangerous and unhelpful. Nobody wants to see a nuclear war happen.
RUSSIA has warned its invasion of Ukraine is likely to end in a nuclear world war, adding “we're all going to die someday”.The latest chilling s.
“This is to my horror on one hand,” she told a panel of experts, “but on the other hand, it is what it is. “Let’s be worthy of our predecessors, everyone who lived through that. It cannot be underestimated.” You can WhatsApp us on 07423 720 250. Email us at [email protected] or call 0207 782 4104. No one else can brag about these weapons, and we won’t brag about them. Simonyan said: “Either we lose in Ukraine or the Third World War starts. We will go to heaven, while they will simply croak... “Moscow understood how Washington was behaving. Washington understood how Moscow was behaving. I do not want the danger to be artificially inflated [but] it is serious, real. In a broadcast last night it said it was “more probable” that President Vladimir Putin would launch a nuclear strike than allow Russia to lose the war.
Margarita Simonyan, editor of state broadcaster RT and one of the Kremlin's highest-profile mouthpieces, declared on TV last night that the idea of Putin ...
The Prime Minister has said Russia must be seen to have failed.' President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen said Russia's attempts at 'blackmail' were doomed to fail. Poland and Bulgaria are already receiving gas via their EU neighbours, including Greece. Western officials say that this represents a major strategic failure for Moscow. 'We have all the weapons we need for this. But the rules of conduct were clear enough. 'Let’s be worthy of our predecessors, everyone who lived through that. We will go to heaven, while they will simply croak... 'Either we lose in Ukraine,' she said, 'or the Third World War starts. It cannot be underestimated.' We will go to heaven while [the West] will simply croak... We're all going to die someday.'
Amidst a series of threats from the Russian establishment on the possibility of a World War III if the West intervenes in the Ukraine conflict, a Russian TV ...
Simonyan continued saying, “Everything will end with a nuclear strike is more probable than the other outcome. According to Newsweek, on Tuesday night's show, 'The Evening With Vladimir Solovyov', host Vladimir Solovyov, accompanied by Margarita Simonyan, journalist and head of RT, said that a nuclear war is the only possibility in order to stop other countries from intervening in Russia's war with Ukraine. Host Vladimir Solovyov, accompanied by Margarita Simonyan, journalist and head of RT, said that a nuclear war is the only possible solution in order to stop other countries from intervening in Russia's war with Ukraine
Viewers were also told that that nuclear conflict is 'more probable' than Vladimir Putin allowing Russia to lose the war in Ukraine.
Speaking to lawmakers in St Petersburg during a televised address, Putin said: "If someone intends to interfere in what is going on from the outside they must know that constitutes an unacceptable strategic threat to Russia. "They must know that our response to counter-strikes will be lightning fast. Simonyan continued: "Everything will end with a nuclear strike is more probable than the other outcome. "Either we lose in Ukraine, or the Third World War starts. “This is our key position on which we base everything. “I would not want to elevate those risks artificially.
Russia has warned of the "real" threat of World War III if any other nation intervenes in Ukraine. Now, on Tuesday, Russian state TV hosts also discussed ...
It is to mention that in recent days, Russian state media has been bombarding viewers with jarring declarations that World War III is imminent. Further, the The Daily Beast reported that Ms Simonyan said, “Everything will end with a nuclear strike, to me, is more probable than the other outcome. Russia has warned of the “real” threat of World War III if any other nation intervenes in Ukraine. Now, a Russian state TV host has discussed the possibility of a war expanding out of Ukraine, telling viewers that a nuclear war would be “ok” because “we are all going to die someday”.
Margarita Simonyan, editor of state broadcaster RT, has made a chilling threat on Russian state television during a week in which the Russian nuclear ...
"We have all the weapons we need for this. "This is to my horror on one hand, but on the other hand, it is what it is. "I would not want to elevate those risks artificially. And we must not underestimate it," Lavrov said. "Either we lose in Ukraine, or the Third World War starts. At the beginning of the week Foreign Minster Sergei Lavrov told the world not to underestimate the considerable risks of nuclear conflict, and said NATO's supply of weapons to Ukraine "in essence" meant that the Western alliance was engaged in a proxy war with Russia.
President Biden's request for an additional $20 billion in military assistance is intended to equip Ukraine for the next five months of war.
President Biden's request for an additional $20 billion in military assistance is intended to equip Ukraine for the next five months of war. Report: Russia earned $66B in fuel exports since start of war on Ukraine - Report: Russia earned $66B in fuel exports since start of war on Ukraine - Her remarks followed Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin'spronouncementthat the U.S. wants "to see Russia weakened to a degree that it can't do the kinds of things it has done in invading Ukraine." Austin too said Ukraine could win the war "with the right equipment." The bottom line: As Mike Mazarr of RAND notes, it's going to become increasingly difficult for the U.S. and NATO to maintain the “balancing act” of giving Ukraine the tools to win “without courting a larger war." - U.K. Foreign SecretaryLiz Trusspromised Wednesday to "keep going further and faster to push Russia out of the whole of Ukraine."
A KREMLIN mouthpiece has said that 'knowing our leader,' the Russian war in Ukraine will spark World War Three but added that Russians will be rewarded with ...
"This is to my horror, on one hand, but on the other hand, with the understanding that it is what it is.” She said that "knowing our leader," the likelihood of nuclear war is the "most probable outcome". A KREMLIN mouthpiece has said that "knowing our leader," the Russian war in Ukraine will spark World War Three but added that Russians will be rewarded with a place in "heaven".
It wasn't about economic heft, diplomatic clout or scientific edge. On April 27, Russian President Vladimir Putin boasted, “We have all the weapons we need for ...
UK defence secretary Ben Wallace has warned that Putin may try to "mobilise" the Russian people with a global offensive against "Nazis" as his invasion of ...
The British Army's series of exercises is fundamental to both. Putin has also threatened to use nuclear weapons against western powers if they get in his way, with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov saying the threat of nuclear war "is serious". Ben Wallace said that the despot will "probably" attempt to "mobilise the Russian people" amid his failing " special military operation".
Russian President Vladimir Putin said that any foreign intervention in Ukraine would provoke what he called a “lightning fast” response from Moscow.
NATO's chief Jens Stoltenberg warned Thursday that the war in Ukraine could last for years. Those include rising energy costs and disrupted supply chains and goods from Russia and Ukraine, among the world's biggest "bread baskets." Indeed, the economic punishment on Russia has been increasing by the day, in the form of more sanctions on its businesses, key sectors and officials close or within Putin's regime. For its part, Russia has sought to inflict its own pain on European countries that are, awkwardly, heavily reliant on Russian natural gas imports. "Ultimately, if he uses nuclear weapons, even a demonstration strike, this would turn Russia into a global pariah," Alberque said. That's Russia's "Victory Day" — the anniversary of Nazi Germany's defeat by the Soviet Union in World War II. Still, if a wider war did break out, "NATO's overall conventional capabilities outmatch Russia's," he noted. "But also there's a logic of mutually assured destruction that hopefully will rein everybody in." Nonetheless, Ramani noted the threat posed by Russia could become more acute if it felt humiliated on the battlefield. In the last few days alone, for example, Russia stopped gas supplies to two European countries and has warned the West several times that the risk of a nuclear war is very "real." At the start of the week, Russia's foreign minister warned that the threat of a nuclear war "cannot be underestimated" and said NATO's supply of weapons to Ukraine was tantamount to the military alliance engaging in a proxy war with Russia. - In the last few days alone, Russia stopped gas supplies to two European countries and has warned the West several times that the risk of a nuclear war is very "real."
"Biden's call for an enormous $33 billion for Ukraine is over half the entire budget for the State Department and USAID," noted CodePink's Medea Benjamin.
Free to share. Free to republish. How can this not lead to escalation?" To inspire. To inform. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. To ignite change for the common good. We don't get diddly squat!" And don't get me started on we citizens who need our material needs met. "It's not cheap. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful.